Return to Homepage/Directory

 

Healthcare – Something Must Change!

US healthcare is the most expensive in the world, yet in many respects (e.g., average life expectancies) other countries achieve comparable or better results.  Could less healthcare be better in some cases?

It is common experience that drugs tend to be over-prescribed (perhaps by several different doctors, none of whom is aware of all the drugs being taken), medical procedures are employed in cases where they have limited if any benefit, and people overlook the health benefits of regular exercise, adequate sleep, a sensible diet, etc.  The Last Well Person, Nortin M. Hadler, M.D., McGill-Queen’s University Press (2004). (Caveat: Dr. Hadler surveys a wide range of medical problems/ treatment options.  For a balanced view, we recommend that you also consider the opinions of other medical professionals.)

One big problem is that healthcare reimbursement rates are for the most part determined by government bureaucrats.  The Medicare reimbursement schedule (developed over the past several decades) provides lucrative compensation for some medical procedures (such as x-rays, MRIs, & surgical procedures) and inadequate compensation for others (e.g., monitoring health and helping patients to stay well).

A second problem is that payment for healthcare services is typically billed to third parties (government agencies and/or insurance companies), with patients paying only a residual share.  This dulls concerns about, or even awareness of the cost of medical tests, medical treatment, prescription drugs, etc.

Healthcare costs have risen faster than prices in general or economic output, and the senior population is growing rapidly. Government healthcare benefits (Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, etc.) are straining government budgets as a result, and the fiscal pressures will increase dramatically in years to come.

Some experts say major savings in healthcare costs could be achieved by restructuring the system to redress the balance between treating illness and preserving wellness.  The overarching change would be to restrict the fee for service model, which currently applies for almost all medical services, to areas (diagnosis, acute care for conditions without a clearly defined mode of treatment) where it properly applies. See The Innovator’s Prescription, Christensen, Grossman and Hwang, McGraw-Hill (2008).

The required changes would be systemic, and as such beyond the capabilities of discrete sectors of the healthcare system (hospitals, doctors, etc.).  Some entity or entities would have to drive the change on a system-wide basis; the most logical candidates are the government, progressive employers with a financial stake in keeping their employees healthy, or integrated healthcare providers like Kaiser Permanente.

Christensen et al. suggest that progressive employers should take the lead.  Viewing the lifetime employment model as defunct, we consider the integrated healthcare provider to be a better bet.  But in any case, given the negative effects that government involvement has had on the healthcare system thus far, we agree that government should not be granted even greater authority over the system. 

Talk about “the triumph of hope over experience.”  Although healthcare costs might well be contained under government supervision as a matter of economic and fiscal necessity, the result would presumably be achieved – as it has been in other countries with government-run healthcare – by de facto rationing.

Although SAFE sees no “silver bullet” solution to the relentless growth of government healthcare outlays, the following steps could help.  For comprehensive discussion, see In Search of Real Healthcare Reform (May 2009).

1. Scrap proposals to use the government’s clout (and our money) to mandate near universal healthcare.  The problem with healthcare that needs fixing is not the number of Americans without insurance per se, it is soaring costs that penalize everyone.

2. End the tax exemption for employer-provided healthcare benefits with the idea that private sector and government employees should make their own arrangements for healthcare services and insurance.  In any case, those whose employers provide healthcare plans should not continue to receive this unjustifiable tax preference.

3. Encourage the use of catastrophic coverage insurance combined with Health Saving Accounts to cover outlays for routine healthcare services.  As an exception to item 2, premiums for such plans should be payable out of pretax income or tax deductible, which would put all taxpayers on an even footing.  Also, to break the state-by-state stranglehold on healthcare insurance (precisely what treatments should be covered, etc.), people should be permitted to purchase coverage from insurance companies located anywhere in the country.

4.  Have the states take full responsibility for their Medicaid and SCHIP programs, with the federal government supporting the programs with block grants.  Once established, the aggregate amount of federal grants would be indexed for inflation, but not allowed to continue growing in real economic terms.

5.  Repeal the federal statute requiring hospital emergency rooms to admit all comers, which inflates hospital costs and has been much abused, while supporting other measures (such as walk-in clinics) to more efficiently respond to the medical needs of the poor and disadvantaged.

6.  End traditional Medicare coverage for all seniors retiring after a given date, e.g., January 1, 2012, providing capped funding for private insurance coverage of future retirees.

7.  Cap punitive damage awards for medical malpractice, which are driving up insurance premiums and inducing doctors to order every medical test known to man whether needed or not.

None of these ideas were reflected in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (GovCare), which in our view represented a big step in the wrong direction.  Many Americans agreed, and over half of the states plus others organized legal challenges. 

The US Supreme Court rejected most of the legal challenges to GovCare in June 2012.  At this point, only action by Congress and/or the Executive Branch can block full-scale implementation of this legislation in 2014.

SAFE agrees with those who advocate the repeal of GovCare, thereby clearing the way for real healthcare reforms (e.g., SAFE’s proposals), which would give patients and doctors more say in healthcare decisions versus expanding the powers of government bureaucrats.  For further discussion see the blog entries listed below. 

Blog entries

5/26/14 – Thoughts about the VA scandal

3/24/14 – Healthcare “reform” is a work in progress

11/4/13 The website is fixable, but GovCare has deeper problems

9/30/13 – Dems to GOP: Shut up and sit down

7/8/13 – Surprise: GovCare employer mandate postponed until 2015

5/27/13 – Aging in Delaware (and elsewhere)

12/10/12 – Never mind a war on obesity

12/3/12 – The GovCare muddle

8/20/12 – Dueling claims re Medicare

7/9/12 – Assessing the GovCare decision

6/18/12 – GovCare saga

4/4/11A glum anniversary for GovCare

1/24/11 – GovCare: Round 2

8/23/10“Good news” about Medicare is much exaggerated

3/29/10 – Raising the ante: America’s future is at stake

3/22/10 – A tangled web: we must enact GovCare to reduce the deficit

3/15/10 – Gridlock won’t look so bad if it stops GovCare

1/25/10 - A setback for GovCare, now what?

12/21/09 – Two crises and a partridge in a pear tree

12/14/09 – Healthcare: down to the wire

11/9/09 – GovCare: good intentions are not enough

11/2/09 – Healthcare insurers: imperfect yes, demons no

10/26/09 – Crunch time in the healthcare debate

10/12/09 – Déjà vu: Scoring a healthcare bill

9/7/09 – A conversation about healthcare

8/24/09 – Healthcare: deal or no deal?

8/17/09 – Healthcare: the empire strikes back

8/10/09 – A national conversation about GovCare

6/1/09 – We interrupt this program for a special announcement

4/6/09 – SAFE plan for healthcare reform is “government-lite”

3/30/09 – A “ready, aim, fire” approach to healthcare reform

3/23/09 – Healthcare plan will not pay for itself

3/16/09 – A tale of two summits [re fiscal responsibility and healthcare, respectively]

2/9/09 – Looking ahead to the Fiscal Responsibility Summit [SCHIP expansion bill passed]

10/20/08 – Both candidates offer “pie in the sky” healthcare plans.

4/7/08 – Straight thinking about Social Security [Medicare & Medicaid are growing even faster]

3/17/08 – A winning strategy for healthcare insurance

3/10/08 – With liberty, justice, and healthcare insurance for all

2/11/08 – If you want good answers on healthcare, ask good questions!

11/26/07 – The key to a better healthcare system: empower patients

10/15/07 – Refundable tax credits: not the answer for healthcare

10/8/07 – The SCHIP veto: a “Pyrrhic victory” at best

8/20/07 – The future of healthcare finance; choosing a path

8/14/07 – Healthcare by the numbers

8/6/07 – Universal healthcare: we don’t want it

7/7/07 – Low share of medical outlays paid by patients leads to waste

Summer 2003 – Healthcare costs are out of control, and we’re not going to take it any more!

nwsltr\nwsltr30.htm

Spring 2003 – It’s a muddle, it’s a train wreck, it’s Medicare.

nwsltr\nwsltr29.htm

Summer 2002 - The effectiveness and future of Medicare.

nwsltr\nwsltr26.htm

Spring, 2002 - Creation and funding of Medicare.

nwsltr/nwsltr25.htm

top